The what Conservative?

The American Conservative once again delivers in its March 23rd edition with 2 defenses of, Charles Freeman, the paid undeclared lobbiest for Saudi Arabia and China, who was to be the gatekeeper of national intelligence for the president. The first article is by the leftist Philip Weiss, proving once again that the only criterion for the Palestinianist heretic Scott McConnell is hatred of Israel. Weiss, being a good deconstructionist, completely ignores the actual arguements against Chas Freeman on China, that he lauded the Tienanmen square massacre and slaughter of Tibetan protestors. Instead the support for the brutal Chinese Communist oligarchs over democracy activists and colonizers over the oppressed is marginalized because neoconservatives, being anti-communists, don't like China. (Of course, weren't the Old Right anti-communist, or has grievance politics driven the so called Paleconservatives away from their claimed roots?)
The second is an article by the "America Firster" Patrick Buchanan. Buchanan article is nothing but an attempt to play grievence politics calling the attacks a smear, while ignoring the content. The justification for this is the supposed hypocrisies of "The Israel Lobby" in attacking Freeman's loyalty. This begs the question as to whether Buchanan is now part of the Wahabbi Lobby, the Saudi Lobby or the ChiCom Lobby. Whatever it is , it isn't America first.
Of course Buchanan fancies himself a patriot, but he has lost sense of "patria", fatherland. For him, loyalty is unflinching hatred of either Israeli policy, Israel's existence as such, or neoconservatives. This isn't pro-America. It is merely an example of the debilitating nature of grievance politics.

Perhaps, I'm old fashioned but those screaming about dual loyalties seem to be projecting, for their primary loyalty does not seem to be with America, if they wanted a Saudi and Chinese lobbyist to decide what the president sees. If you think I'm being rude in my assessment, I am only using the same type of language and tactics used in The American Conservative.

Why I don't normally comment on the crayon scribblings from the asylum known as Antiwar.com

http://antiwar.com/justin/justin122908.php

Yet again Dennis Raimondo sinks leftist tripe in his pathological hatred of Israel. One would think the fact that hundreds of rockets were fired on Israeli towns and cities during the Hudna/ceasfire and the fact that Hamas declared an end to the ceasefire last week would figure into the rants of the bigot. Likewise the fact that Israel freed over 200 Palestinian Prisoners last week in an attempt to keep the violence limited to a handful of attacks on Israel/day would count for something. But not for those who hate Israel’s existence.
What else do you expect of one who speaks of 300 dead, without noting that 250 are Hamas fighters? Or one who fails to note Israel has been going out of its way to warn, by leaflet of telephone call, civilians being used as human shields?

It is true that the Kadima junta running Israel are using this for political ends. But they did not declare an end to peace, Hamas did.

“I won't bother answering the "talking points" of Israel's powerful lobby in the U.S. – the Palestinians are terrorists, they deserved what they got, those missile barrages fired in recent weeks (in which not a single Israeli was killed) were ample provocation, etc. The whole world knows that none of these have anything to do with the latest Israeli military action.”
Of course he won’t because the facts are irrelevant to him. Similarly, Hamas’s declaration that the ceasefire was over is of no importance. The only thing that has values is the leftist paradigm that weakness equals virtue and darker people are better. The libertine Fannonite deserves no mention at a conservative site, save derision.

“The entire operation is, instead, part and parcel of a long-standing concerted campaign by the Israeli government to further marginalize and drive out the remnants of the Palestinian people who still cling tenaciously to what's left of their land.”
Considering the fact that Israel ethnically cleansed Gaza of all Jews and then handed it and new infrastructure over to the Palestinian authority, I don’t know what Raimondo is thinking.


“It is a policy of military and economic warfare, aimed at making life impossible for the Palestinian helots….As the new Sparta of the Middle East runs roughshod over the laws of morality and basic human decency, Israel's amen corner in the U.S. is going into overdrive in an effort to prettify one of the ugliest incidents in a decade of unmitigated cruelty and brutality”
Such big words from a man whose knowledge of ancient Greece is pining for the Sacred Band of Thebes or Spartan barrack life along with the occasional flourish of epistolary onanism. Does Raimondo realize that Israel is a parliamentary democracy, 1/5th of whose citizens are Arab beneficiaries of affirmative action? I doubt he knows anything outside of CAIR and communist press releases on the subject.

“All the familiar "progressive" voices – with certain sterling exceptions – are suddenly stilled: we hear nothing from our Democratic politicians, those fabled agents of "change," except expressions of support for Israel's war crimes.”
Such a conservative, Raimondo is. He calls for leftist activism, while using imaginary “war crimes” as reason to empower the internationalist left. Does he imagine that the US would be immune from such trans-national socialist judicial activism, or is his primary loyalty hatred of Israel?

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declares that Israel has "the right to defend itself," without deigning to inform us as to whether the Palestinians have the same right.”
And if they were shooting the Hamas Jihadis using them as cattle/human shields the Palestinians would be acting in self defense.

“For all those hysterical ultra-Zionists in both Israel and the U.S. who thought Obama's election would be disastrous to the Zionist project, and their own efforts to expand it beyond its historic borders, let this be an object lesson in the danger of jumping to unwarranted conclusions.”
Historic what? Israel controlled the West Bank and Gaza for 30 years, or 11 more than the 1949 ceasefire borders were in effect. Israel’s historic borders would include the territories it ceded for the “piece process”.

“If they'd listened before they jumped – or paid attention to what they read on Antiwar.com – they would have realized how utterly misplaced their paranoia would turn out to be.”
Considering Dennis’s basic lack of recent history, why trust anything he publishes including his false name? (His actual name is Dennis, Justin is his working name.)

“Obama has been in the Israel Lobby's back pocket from the beginning, as his speech to AIPAC – a masterstroke of groveling – made all too clear.”
So 30 years of radical anti-Israel affiliations, as well as his leftist internationalist picks for office are to be ignored, but political pandering is gospel. What is Raimondo mainlining?

“Like all U.S. presidents since Bush the Elder, this one is committed to maintaining and elaborating on our Israel-centric Middle East policy, of which the Iraq war was only the most dramatic chapter.”
You mean the same George HW Bush who toppled an Israeli government (The Shamir administration), after forcing it to accede to Syrian control of Lebanon for his own oil war, who then foisted the Madrid “piece process” on Israel?

“Obama may have opposed that particular war, but he will do nothing to reverse its consequences, the most dramatic of which appears to be the unleashing of the Israeli military machine on the region. First it was Lebanon, followed by the buzzing of Syrian airspace and the bombing of an alleged "nuclear facility" that turned out to be an ordinary weapons dump. Now we have the end of "disengagement" in Gaza and the opening up of a new front in Israel's relentless war of expansion.”
Other than at the center of Raimondo’s paranoia and lies since 9-11, where has Israel been expanding?

“It is a war that has been financed by U.S. tax dollars and fought with American weapons, with the active collaboration and support of our government.”
Those damn Israelis, responding to attacks by the Gaza offspring of the Muslim Brotherhood, while the US is at war with Al Qaeda, one of whose constituent groups, Islamic Jihad is a sibling of Hamas.

“We have paid for the radical expansion of the Israeli "settlements" by armed bands of ultra-nationalist fanatics, Israel's version of the Taliban.”
What expansion is he blathering about? Besides, where is the repression of women exporting of terror in Gush Etzion? Raimondo should go there and then to Hamastan. Or not. He would be stoned to death as a homosexual, unless they made an unprincipled exception for an ally, as they do with communists.

"Indeed, Israeli opinion is moving rapidly in the radicals' direction, and the victory of Benjamin Netanyahu and the far-right Likud Party in the upcoming election is virtually assured – with even more extreme elements waiting in the wings for their moment."
Ah, that crazy Likud party, which calls for economic liberty, while also demanding security. Sounds like the GOP to me. In fact until last week, Netanyahu was spending almost as much time attacking true Israeli nationalists, as he was blathering about the need for Kadima to be his junior partner.

“As the leaders of a settler colony implanted in the midst of Arab lands, the founders of the Israeli state were faced with a conundrum from the very start. No matter how enlightened and progressive the early settlers considered themselves, they could not escape their status as unwanted interlopers, the advance guard of what was essentially a foreign invasion. Living in their utopian kibbutzes and thinking they were constructing an egalitarian paradise, what they were really building was a rigidly hierarchical society, a caste system with the settlers and their descendants at the top, arranged in tiers according to their origins in the "diaspora," with the Palestinians at the very bottom – a displaced underclass forcibly segregated and routinely subjected to Israeli state violence.”
At least Dennis is somewhat honest in his pathological hatred of Israel. Hence all attacks on it are just and any defense illegitimate. This is rank hypocricy, given that he lives in his own settler colony in North America, known as the United States. I believe in the right of conquest. Dennis just admits his anti-conservative hatred of America's founding with his aping of Fritz Fannon's "wretched of the earth". That is assuming he understands what he is writing.

“Like a caged lion, grievously wounded, which nevertheless manages to roar and occasionally strike out – however ineffectually – at its tormentors, the Palestinian people are unbowed.”
And when will Dennis be justifying AIM and Aztlanista violence against America in his orgy of anti-Western cultural Marxism?

“The Israelis – and the U.S. – rail against Hamas as a gang of terrorists, yet most of the governments of the region started out as "terrorist" gangs. Two were called the Irgun and the Haganah, the revolutionary movements that carried out attacks on civilians, including the British as well as the Arabs, in their battle to establish the state of Israel. Hamas will do no more, and no less, in their bid to establish a Palestinian state.”
Other than Jordan, that is. And Gaza could have been virtually independent had Hamas not tried to use its inhabitants as captive human shields in its attacks on Israeli civilians. Speaking of revolutionary gangs, how long will it be until Raimondo denounces the Sons of Liberty as well as Americans moving past the Proclamation line of 1763?

“If nothing else, this fresh paroxysm of Israeli aggression ought to debunk, once and for all, the neocon talking point that democracies never go to war with each other.”
So is Raimondo's nihilistic lust for Israeli blood motivated by nothing more than pathologically unbalanced rage at neoconservatives?

“Yet here we have a country that styles itself an island of Western-style liberalism in a sea of Oriental despotism going to war with the only other democratically elected government in the immediate vicinity.”
One vote, one time isn’t democracy. I don’t see Israel attacking Turkey, so Raimondo is just proving his utter ignorance. (That was redundant; Raimondo does that whenever he puts 10 words together on the Middle East.)

“Whatever the military outcome of the present conflict – in all likelihood a stalemate – this is a big political victory for Hamas, which ordinary Palestinians see actively defending them against the rampaging Israelis. The moderates on the West Bank are undercut, once again, and that has always been the Israeli strategy.”
You mean like Abbas, who demanded Israel act to destroy Hamas before PA elections?

“Their first target was the decidedly secular Palestine Liberation Organization, which they did everything to destroy and undercut – even to the point of providing legal status and covert funding to Hamas. These followers of radical Islamist preachers began as a religious association, formally registered with the Israeli authorities. Hamas was encouraged as a potentially more compliant competitor with the PLO. Another case of blowback, with a vengeance.”
You mean like the insipid liberalism that forces Raimondo to ignore the goals of Islamic Jihadis to conquer not just Israel, but Spain as noted in Hamas’s charter?

“Having given birth to the monster of Hamas, the mutant offspring of occupation and dispossession, the Israelis will be forgiven if they refuse to acknowledge the family resemblance.”
Of course, the idiot has never heard of the Islamic Brotherhood or read Sayed Qutb.

“Yet it is unmistakable. Both Israel and Hamas-stan are the spawn of religious and ethnic exclusivism and messianism, their leaders fanatics armed with state power. There are differences, of course, a major one being that one side is funded to the tune of $3 billion a year and supported unconditionally by Washington, while the Palestinians – shot at by their fellow Arabs as they try to cross the border into Egypt – stand pretty much alone.
This latest bloody chapter in the tragic history of the region is being written because all the main protagonists benefit: the Israelis, Hamas, and radicals of all stripes, especially those groups aligned with al-Qaeda. As in the case of the Iraq war, bin Laden's narrative of an Israeli-Crusader invasion intent on stamping out Islam is seemingly verified as blood flows freely in the streets of Gaza.”
Because we all know that Israel wants to conquer the world. I don’t know if this is projection, leftist moral equivalence, or the scribbling of one missing their dose of Thorazine.

“The Israeli rampage is not in our interests, and the longer it continues the more it threatens the already tenuous position of U.S. troops in Iraq, endangering them by inflaming the local populace, which is vehemently pro-Palestinian. The Israeli blitz is sending shockwaves through the region that could upset several apple-carts of U.S. construction, including the regime in Egypt, the pro-U.S. Jordanian monarchy, and especially our rambunctious Iraqi protectorate, where anti-U.S. sentiment is not so quietly building.”
So suddenly Dennis wants the neocon experiment in Iraq to succeed. Has he no semblance of honor or intellectual honesty?

“If American interests in the region are to be served, then this unhealthy relationship has to change. Yet it won't change until and unless the political power of the Israel Lobby is broken on the home front. If it takes the prospect of World War III to bring us to that point, it will be far too high a price to pay – yet one that seems increasingly unavoidable.”
The Soviets are attacking West Berlin? Oh, wait he means World War IV, which seems to have started back in 618, when the Muslims began to pine for world domination. Dennis just is unable to pay attention to facts not from the perspective of the communist Nation magazine.

Bah humbug to Intolerant Minority kvetching

Merry Jewish Christmas!

By Robert Stacy McCain on 12.24.08 @ 11:12AM

My friend Marty Beckerman calls attention to an ironic skirmish in the "War on Christmas":

"Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" caused a stir at a New Hanover County school. A parent complained about the song's religious reference and got it pulled from her child's kindergarten Christmas show at Murrayville Elementary School. The song was pulled "because it had the word Christmas in it," said Rick Holliday, assistant school superintendent. A Jewish mother, who didn't want her name published, objected to what she called "religious overtones" in the song. So the principal agreed to pull it from the program.

Irony? "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" was written by a Jew, Johnny Marks, who also wrote "I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day," "Rockin' Around the Christmas Tree," and "A Holly Jolly Christmas." As Beckerman notes, Jewish songwriters also wrote or co-wrote such holiday standards as:

• "The Christmas Song (Chestnuts Roasting On An Open Fire)" -- Mel Torme and Bob Wells, both Jewish;
• "Santa Claus is Coming to Town" -- co-written by J. Fred Coots, Jewish;
• "Silver Bells" -- Ray Evans and Jay Livingston, both Jewish;
• It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year" -- co-written by George Wyle, Jewish;
• "Sleigh Ride" -- co-written by Mitchell Parish, Jewish;
• "Let It Snow" -- Sammy Cahn and Jule Styne, both Jewish; and
• "White Christmas" -- Irving Berlin, Jewish.

Of course, none of these songs is as important as the original Jewish contribution to Christmas, but if the "religious overtones" of Johnny Marks' innocuous song are enough to shut down a kindergarten Christmas show, let's not risk an ACLU lawsuit by mentioning that whole Bethlehem-and-the-manger trip.

---

The mother in question is an intolerant bigot. She care's not a whit about diversity, or the tolerance that is needed, above all by religious minorities.
I bet she is not actually religious and would be mortified at the actual message of Hanukkah (Fundamentalism, national liberation, death to collaborators. There is a reason this holiday was intentionally downplayed after the failure of the Bar Kochba revolt.)
She should spend her time teaching her child to be Jewish. Perhaps a nice presentation to the class for Passover would have been nice. However, I doubt she knows enough for this. She likely defines herself as "not Christian" more than actually Jewish. Grievance politics makes a poor ersatz faith.

No Collaboration with Obamunism

There can be no loyal opposition to a president disloyal to the nation, to a regime installed by lies which seeks to overthrow the Constitution in steps, or to a media and international business class which profit over the destruction of the nation. It is as our duty to oppose them as we would a revolution, an invading army, or an oligarchy for this is exactly what they seek.

There is no Red November, only the spiral of a revolutionary vanguard marching through the institutions. The terrorist of yesteryear now creates progressive pedagogy. The man trained to teach the new proletariat to be become active and change the system, no becomes president. The failure of government mandated loans to the unqualified becomes an excuse for the government to control them, to own the means of production. The financiers, who failed to do their duty (Goldman Sachs), now get the power to control industries (Paulson). The media, which once claimed to “speak truth to power”, now seeks to suck at the teat of government (GE/GM/NBC), or to gain protection from competition in the form of a “Fairness Doctrine”. And this nation, once strong enough to prevent any foreign army from drinking from the Mississippi, is on well on the way to making this hoard of 12-30 million (4-10% of our population) citizens. The Danube has been crossed, Hadrianople awaits, how long till our Rome falls?

To be a loyal opposition to this is to collaborate, for what we face is a non-violent revolution. It must be met with a determined but non-violent counter-revolution. Our battlefields are the hearts and minds of our fellow citizens, the halls of governance, the institutions of education, finance, and industry and the media.

A president elected with a majority of less than 6% has no mandate to shred the Constitution, to enslave and indoctrinate our children under the rubric of mandatory community service, to declare what when and how political opinions may be discussed, to nationalize healthcare or the automobile industry, or to elect a new voting demographic. Our duty is to say no to
Vichy conservatives and collaborationist loyal opposition. Our duty is to the vanguard of a peaceful counterrevolution.

I leave you with words from men far wiser than I.

Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official, save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him insofar as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiently or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country. In either event, it is unpatriotic not to tell the truth, whether about the president or anyone else. "- Theodore Roosevelt

"The Roman Republic fell, not because of the ambition of Caesar or Augustus, but because it had already long ceased to be in any real sense a republic at all. When the sturdy Roman plebeian, who lived by his own labor, who voted without reward according to his own convictions, and who with his fellows formed in war the terrible Roman legion, had been changed into an idle creature who craved nothing in life save the gratification of a thirst for vapid excitement, who was fed by the state, and who directly or indirectly sold his vote to the highest bidder, then the end of the republic was at hand, and nothing could save it. The laws were the same as they had been, but the people behind the laws had changed, and so the laws counted for nothing. Theodore Roosevelt

Let us contemplate out forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that 'if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event. Samuel Adams

If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be even a worse fate. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. Prime Minister Winston Churchill

Prostitution Raid links Communist Tax Lawyer, leftist voter project, and 9/11 Truther Movement

You just can't make this stuff up.

Louis Posner, a National Lawyers Guild affiliated Tax Attorney, is
arrested for running a Strip Club, which was a front for prostitution. What makes this case unique is that the funds were laundered through Voter March, a leftist election reform organization.

ABOUT VOTER MARCH

Background:



Voter March began on November 14, 2000, as four founding members organizing people who wanted to express their opposition to the irregularities and egregious conduct of Election 2000 and the direction in which an illegitimate administration is taking the country. As an internet-based grass-roots group, having logged over one million hits to its website since November 2000.



Voter March organized major national demonstrations to protest the disenfranchisement of voters in Election 2000 and the highly partisan U.S. Supreme Court decision which selected the President. On January 20th, 2001, Voter March organized the Inaugural Voter March at Dupont Circle in Washington, DC., where thousands of people turned out in the cold, rainy weather to protest the disenfranchisement of thousands of voters in Florida and a Supreme Court decision that undermined the franchise of all citizens by "selecting" a president through judicial fiat. Click on January 20 HQ; On May 19th, 2001, Voter March organized thousands of protestors for the Voter Rights March in Washington DC and San Francisco. Click on May 19 HQ



Voter March has been responsible for organizing dozens of teach-ins and seminars across the country, with thousands of participants, including speaker events for authors Vincent Bugliosi and Greg Palast.



The Voter March platform calls for a Voters' Bill of Rights for critically-needed reforms, including improved voter registration. Voter March also fully supports the peace and anti-war movements and is adamantly opposed to the unelected, illegitimate, unmandated President Bush and his Administration's plans to wage unilateral war against Iraq.



Voter March is independent and not funded or controlled by any organization. Voter March, Ltd. is a New York State not-for-profit organization that qualifies under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code as a tax exempt organization. The Director of Voter March is founder Louis J. Posner, a New York City attorney and member of the National Lawyer's Guild, who is listed in "Who's Who in American Lawyers," "Who's Who in America," and "Who's Who in the World."

In 2002, Voter March became involved in the 9/11 Truther movement. http://www.votermarch.org/PDF%20Files/VM%20911%20GUIDE.pdf

I would ask our accidental governor if Elliot Spitzer is involved, but he is too busy colluding with Mayor Bloomberg on the end run around the Commerce Clause known as the Amazon.com Tax.

Trade with China is Never Free

This is not another rant about products and food from the People's Republic of China poisoning us. Nor is it about the political and religious prisoners forced to work in Logai, Chinese Gulags, making said products. You've doubtless read those. No, this is about the Chinese government using technology that American companies provide or they steal to reduce liberty in China and threaten America.

And one name just keeps popping up; Cisco. Back in 1994 in order to set up shop in China and produce networking and security systems and electronics for less, Cisco sold its soul, by selling and continuing to sell the communist regime the systems set up systems to find dissidents and democracy activists. Now that decision has borne more poisoned fruit.
Back in January, the FBI released a report indicating that Chinese companies were counterfeiting Cisco and other network equipment and that US government contractors were installing this equipment. Of course the loss of intellectual capital and sales hurts Cisco and they deserve far worse. However, these shoddy products also pose a security risk since a Chinese company wrote the underlying code.

Does this have anything to do with 300 million/day cyber-attacks on the Pentagon? I don't have any clearance, but the answer is rather obvious. However, two congressmen have admitted that Congress has been hacked by China. Representatives Wolf (R-VA) and Smith (R-NJ) both have had their office computers broken in to. So far the only information, which has been publicly acknowledged to have been stolen, was that on Chinese dissidents. The true extent of the breach will never really be disclosed and the damage done to the US will never be acknowledged.

Of course, I shouldn't pick on Cisco. Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Cisco, Sun Microsystems and Skype have all aided the Chinese censor information in the PRC. But the decision of Cisco to manufacture components and systems in China, a decision shared by too many companies, has helped solidify Chinese tyranny at home and undermine American security.

Just another cost of Most Favored Nation Status and American companies selling the rope, which will be used to hang us.

The Tranzi March towards EU Tyranny is no long a secret

Most Americans have little to no understanding of the European Union. Founded under tripartite coal and steel trade negotiations, many viewed the EU as a free trade agreement that promotes liberty. Others see it as the European version of the United States. This fundamental misunderstanding has led American Presidents from George HW Bush to his son, to all of the current major candidates for president to support the EU, and in the case of President George W Bush to push for its expansion into Turkey.

Whatever the EU began as, it most certainly is not a free market anything. The Eurocrats in Brussels have decided to define products, weights, measures, and health policies across the member states. On multiple occasions the proponents of this "trade alliance" have called for a unified military command. Some may respond by suggesting that this is merely a natural progression such as the change from These United States in the Articles of Confederation to The United States under the Constitution. However, this ahistorical belief that centralization will inevitably lead to a liberal constitution misses the point.

Imagine if the people of the various states refused to ratify the Constitution and the Federalists responded by having the state legislatures vote on it piecemeal, while appropriating money to propagandize for it. Then imagine that the Federalists in the Continental Congress banned the anti-Federalists. Then imagine that while this was going on, the Federalists decided to national arrest warrant, whose defined crime of "racism" is so nebulous that it includes any opposition to the inclusion of non-natives or the expansion to new lands. I would say that this is exactly what is happening, except as it is clear by now any comparison of the EU Trans-National Socialists to the American Founders is obscene.

And yet it just gets worse. For all the calls that Bat Ye'or was conspiratorial with her warnings of Eurabia, it is impossible to deny when supposed "right-wingers" like the fraud Sarkozy call for a Mediterranean Union. I would normally suggest that Bat Ye'or and American conservatives go over to Europe to warn them of the threat. However, the arrest of the liberal cartoonist Gregorius Nekschot, suggest that doing so would lead to their arrest.

Regardless of their own opposition, the peoples of Europe are being reorganized into an illiberal tyranny bent on destroying their culture, if not Islamicizing it. God save Europe from the New Class.